Site Links: Site Map | Cities Entertainment Ltd | Cafe Premier | Museum Shop Partners |



THE OTTOMAN POINT OF VIEW


A summary of the book (in translation) “The Great Dragut – His Siege of Malta and his last campaign", by Orhan Ondes.


Narratives regarding the Great Siege of Malta of 1565 have been published in many languages, particularly in the West. One of the most important narratives, an eye-witness account, was published in 1568 by Francesco di Corregio Balbi, a diary titled  “La Verdera relaçion de todo lo que el ano de MDLXV ha sucedido en la Isla de Malta”.

The Order of St John has built its culture of memory and part of its corporate identity around the Great Siege. Visitors to Malta stand perplex at the marvellous marble inlaid floor of St John’s Co-Cathedral at Valletta, where many of the 400 commemorative slabs recount the heroism of knights of the Order of St John during the Great Siege or otherwise try to reach the benchmark of heroism set by the Great Siege in a later period. Many accounts have been written, the National Library of Valletta has thousands of manuscripts related to the identity of the Order. The Great Siege was of enormous importance and consequence for Malta and the Maltese. On an international European scale of merits, the Order gained tremendous prestige and perceived as the ‘shield of Europe’.  On another scale, the one of practical reality, the Great Siege of Malta was a non-event for the larger European players. France and Venice, for instance, had excellent trade relationships with the Ottoman Empire and the loss of Malta would not have meant a thing for them. Only the Pope showed great interest in the fate of the Order at Malta and offered substantial aid.

But what about the Ottoman side of the affair? There it seems mostly a forgotten event, primarily one may think because the Ottomans tripped in Malta on their way to Europe over sea. From a critical point of view, one may say that the Ottoman failure in the siege was insignificant, since the road to Europe via the Balkans was a very viable alternative.
There are few domestic contemporary and comprehensive literary sources regarding the “The Great Siege of Malta 1565” in the Ottoman archives, such as the account of Katip Celebi titled “Tuhfetul-kibar fi esfaril bihar”, the works of Ali Haydar Emir and Ali Riza Seyfioglu. In a modern book about the history of Turkey “Turkiye Tarihi” by Yilmaz Oztuna the siege of Malta is mentioned. There is only one biography of Turgut Reis (The Great Dragut) by Cevat Sakir Kabagacli.

Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, the Ottoman Emperor (lived from 1494 to 1566) had conquered Yemen, Algeria, Bagdad, Belgrade, Budapest, Nahcivan, Rhodes, Revan, Tebriz, Temesvar and many other territories during his rule. The borders of his ever expanding Ottoman Empire reached to Austria, the Persian Gulf, Arabia and Red Sea, until he was momentarily stopped at Vienna in 1529 and at Malta in 1565. He had a life full of accomplishments, but only these two failures. He was regarded as ruthless conqueror, but a benign ruler. Seen from the Ottoman point of view, the Great Siege was not only a military war. It also represented a series of revenge and retaliation meted out towards Christian warriors such as the knights of the Order of St John, who were successively expelled from Jerusalem, Cyprus, Halicarnassus and Rhodes by Islamic and Ottoman forces. Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent was bent to excise the Order of St John from their new home, a tiny rock named Malta. The Order of St John had accepted Malta as a new home after being expelled from Rhodes by a very young Suleiman on 1st January 1523. From Rhodes the Order had relentlessly attacked all Ottoman shipping, disturbing trade and pilgrimages. In medieval times travel by sea meant mostly sailing along the coast, for navigation and safety reasons. Rhodes is situated closely to the Turkish coast and the Order’s navy had a firm grip on any shipping through the Aegean and along Turkey's southern coast. The Ottoman Empire was possibly at the apex of its power, reaching from nearly the whole of the Middle East, most of the North-African coast and a large part of the Balkans and Greece. In the hands of these impertinent Christians, the island of Rhodes was as much an intolerable nuisance to Suleiman as it was a valuable possession to the Christian realm, still clinging on the hope of one day recapturing the Holy Land.

The Grand Master of the Order of St John at Rhodes was the 70 year old Philippe Villiers de L’Isle Adam, coming from a long-established family of Beauvais, France. When he was elected Grand Master of the Order and arrived at Rhodes on the 19th September 1521, the Ottoman army was in Belgrade, celebrating their victory of capturing the city. Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent felt compelled to make a decision regarding Rhodes because of the damage of the navy of the knights of St John caused to the Turkish sea trade. A unsuccessful attempt to oust the knights from Rhodes had been made previously in the year 1480.

Although Suleiman’s aim was diplomatically worded in a letter of congratulations to the new Grand Master Philippe Villiers de L’Isle Adam, the veiled threat had not escaped the latter’s understanding and immediately requested help from the French King Francois 1 in a letter dated 28th October 1521.  Suleiman’s ultimatum expired on the 10th June 1522 while attacking the island of Kos. Needless to say that the Order kindly refused to accept the invitation to surrender. On the day of the celebration of Corpus Domini on the 26th June 1522, the Ottoman navy appeared south of Rhodes and anchored at Kalitheas Bay. A large scale siege followed and in December Suleiman repeated his wish that the knights surrender and not engage any further in bloodshed. On the 24th of December 1522 the Order accepted his conditions for surrender.  The knights had thought it better to surrender and to live to fight another day. Rhodes was left to the Ottomans on New Year’s Day 1523. On boarding his ship, Grand Master Philippe Villiers de L’Isle Adam was forced to bow to Suleiman and kiss his hand. Jean Parisot de Valette, then a young knight leaving Rhodes, could not have fathomed that 42 years later he would be in the same position as Philippe Villiers de L’Isle Adam, a Grand Master besieged on an island by Suleiman the Magnificent.

Rhodes was less than seven miles away from the Turkish coast, although he could have whipped out each and every member of the Order on Rhodes, Suleiman’s aim was only keeping the knights of the Order away from the continent and safe guarding Turkish sea trade. His aim as a ruler was certainly not to engage in bloodshed for fun. However, once the Order was settled at Malta in 1530, it continued policing the Mediterranean Sea in its fashion, disrespecting their terms of surrender to Suleiman. Malta is in the middle of the Mediterranean, where the sea is at its narrowest. It also nearly the same distance from Turkey as from Spain. The Ottoman Empire was ever expanding to the west, the Spanish Empire likewise to the east, the grey areas of both realms meeting at Malta. Instead of Mdina, the capital city of Malta, the Knights preferred to locate in the harbour where there was the fishing hamlet of Birgu. Its old tower was soon enlarged and the Order began to build up castles and fortifications fast. Till the Great Siege there were smaller attacks by Ottomans, including the famous raid of Dragut’s in 1559. During the years leading to 1565, the knights built up good defence lines on the island using the advantage of the natural rock structure of the island.

Emperor Charles V of Spain had donated the island of Malta to the knight of the Order of St John in order to defend it against the Muslims and Ottomans. Suleiman regarded this as treason and a breach of conditions. He also did not understand the Order’s hate towards him. Had he not spared their lives at Rhodes, did they not sail away with their entire fleet intact and all their prized possessions? They should have been thankful that he did not erase their memory from history. Even Dragut Pasha, the famous Ottoman commander and sea hero, had advised Suleiman not to let the knights live. Young Suleiman had let them go free and the old Suleiman felt the anger of this betrayal so much that it would become his main motive to besiege Malta. If the knights had stopped attacking Muslims there would not have been a Great Siege of Malta. In 1564 Suleiman’s consultants were advising him to capture Malta: “While Malta is in the hands of the Order of St John, every Ottoman ship sailing from Istanbul to Trablus (Libya) will be in danger” and “This rock is like an obstacle harming the constitution of our lands. If Malta is not captured in a short while, the connection between the Ottoman Africa and the Asian home land will be broken.”  Now, as an old man, Suleiman was ready to sail to Malta with an enormous navy and army. Grand Master De Valette’s reputation was well known to Suleiman, but weighing his enemy’s chances of survival in the coming siege of Malta he told his advisors that “It makes me sad that I shall have to cast away such an old man from his house.” However, the loyal defenders of Christianity, the knights of St John never remembered the clemency Suleiman had shown them. But it was clear that there would be no exit strategy available for the knights this time round.

The Maltese side the story was quite different. Indeed, the Maltese people have a language that has much in common with Arabic and they were Muslim before the Norman invasion of 1090 AD. Because of that and also the infertility of the islands, the Ottomans were not interested in Malta although successful raids by Berbers were carried out on the island of Gozo and Malta, most notably in 1429.  However, Maltese ships had never attacked Ottoman ships before the knights of the Order came to the island. So it was quite acceptable to say that the Maltese anticipated the arrival of the Order of St John as the starting point with their troubles with the Turks.

At this time of age, the business of piracy was much more profitable than farming or fishing and both Muslims and Christians were engaged wholeheartedly, not as much from the point of view of two clashing religions but more from the mutual beneficial point of raiding economy and slave-trading. There were slave markets at Algeria, Trablus, Napoli, Malta, Tunis, selling people by the thousands from both sides.

Over the years, tension rose to unsustainable proportions. Continuing their raids on Ottoman ships, both the knights of the Order and the Maltese went on with their raids on Ottoman trade ships and the prisons in Malta were filled with Muslims and Turks. They even managed to capture the old nanny of Suleiman’s daughter. Normally a small island would be unimportant for the mighty Sultan, ruling such a wide geography. Main reason of his anger was the ungratefulness of the knights whose lives were spared by the Sultan and their continuous harming of Ottoman sea trade, just as they did when they were still in Rhodes.

Suleiman’s patience ended when the Knights captured a Turkish trade ship with a very substantial pay load. He has decided to solve the problem by sending his combined army and navy to Malta. Also, Malta was the perfect port to support his logistics in his advance to Europe. Sultan Suleiman remembered the Knights formerly of Rhodes and they were certainly not ordinary Christian soldiers. They would sacrifice their lives to protect Christianity and they hated every fibre of the Ottomans, fearing them as the advancing part of Islam, just as Europe had experienced in the eighth and ninth centuries.

Admiral Piyale Pasha and General Serdar Mustapha Pasha had been commissioned to lead the Navy and Army expedition to Malta respectively and were expected to take the command in harmony under the generalship of the Great Dragut. That presumption of harmony was the first big mistake and this two-headed direction would be one of the biggest reasons for failure of the Malta campaign. Preparations were under way for a long term siege, taking into consideration that Malta was at the far extreme of the Empire, unlike Rhodes which was visible with the naked eye from the Turkish coast. Spies had brought the news that the new Grand Master Jean Parisot De Valletta had already made sure there would be no food available from the soil of Malta for his enemies.

At arrival at Malta the total Ottoman force counted around 50.000 soldiers. Malta’s forces were approximately 9.000 detailed as following: 2.500 Knights, 400 Spanish troops under the command of the knights De Miranda and Juan de la Cerda, 200 Italian troops under the command of the knight Asdrubale de Medici, 200 French troops under the command of the knight De la Motto, 400 Italian troops under the command of Colonel Mas, 100 guards of St Elmo Castle, 500 sailors of the Order’s fleet,200 crew of the knights, 200 crew of Sicilian and Greeks at Malta, 500 rowers (slaves, prisoners and rented rowers) and 3.000 local Maltese.

Even though Mustapha Pasha had insisted on keeping the Navy at the North of the island to catch any ship leaving or any help arriving at the island, Admiral Piyale Pasha decided to remain with his fleet at the ports after landing due to bad weather at sea. Because of his inharmonious attitude the Ottoman navy stayed locked at the south ports of Malta without a proper reason during most of the siege.

Moreover, Mustapha Pasha wanted to start the siege from the St. Michael and Birgu side, employing just 10,000 troops with enough firepower to do the job intended within one week, the period Sultan Suleiman had calculated to run over the island. Due to the same attitude of Piyale Pasha, he had to revise his plan and begin with St. Elmo. When the Great Dragut joined the war a few weeks later, he questioned the reason why the siege had not started with the Mdina or St Michael castles too. The main body of the Ottoman army remained at Marsa, a flat marsh and unprotected against the knights’ cavalry attacks directed from Mdina. Because the Ottomans failed to capture the Mdina castle, their army was never safe. Relentlessly, the small and fast cavalry units made sudden raids into the army camps, poisoning the water sources, exhausting the Ottoman Army. The siege began at the 21st of May 1565and Dragut joined on the 3rd of June. He arrived later due to unfinished business in Tunisia and the Ottomans always regretted his late arrival. It is firmly believed that should he had been in Malta at the beginning of siege, the coordination of the command would have been firmly established and right decisions taken.

Another tragedy hit the Ottomans. Their most valuable leader, Dragut Pasha died accidently when stone shrapnel hit him in the head on the 21st of June, the day St Elmo fell to the Ottoman forces. What should have been a happy day with celebrations on their first victory in the siege was a day of bitter mourning. The soldiers were attacking mainly with rocks and stones as ammunition, from the fields and walls of Malta, while the defenders, knights of St John were successful and experienced in defending castles and quickly rebuilding collapsed walls, since their time in Jerusalem. Also the Knights were used to fight with heavy armour. That is obviously a disadvantage in the open field in close combat with non-armoured or very light armoured Ottoman soldiers. But in attacking a castle the non-armoured Janissaries were clearly in the disadvantage. After St. Elmo our army began to attack to Senglea, Birgu and Castile.

On the 7th of August Turks got into the fortification of Castile but they retreated in a hurry because of a small cavalry unit from Mdina attacked the command centre at Marsa, acting like they were the long expected Christian relief army from Sicily. At the end of August Malta was still resisting, but Mustapha Pasha knew that if they were able to go on with the siege just a little longer, Malta would fall. There were also logistical problems of delivering ammunition and food for the army. Winter was approaching and Piyale Pasha stated that it was not possible to delay their departure with more than three weeks or they would be risking the fleet in early wintry storms. Mustapha Pasha, a land soldier with not a clue about sea faring, had neither any idea how precarious the situation was at Birgu and Senglea. The strongholds were about to collapse should the attacks continue at the same pace.
Ottoman opinion was that they were the victim of naked hate. According to the Ottoman sources this hate aimed at Ottomans during the Great Siege was so intense big that every captured Ottoman soldier would be decapitated and their heads put on pikes and shown at the fortification walls. Furthermore, on a few occasions the decapitated heads of Ottoman prisoners were shot back into the Ottoman camps in an attempt to destroy the moral of Ottoman Army. The Turkish Cemetery at Marsa (near the Grand Harbour of Valletta) contains many graves of Ottoman soldiers.

Around the 25th of August Don Garcia’s fleet from Sicily departed to Malta with 6800 troops on board. This big fleet wasted time in the channel because of the bad weather and ambivalent leadership. They only arrived at Malta on the 7th of September, just one day before Ottomans had decided to leave the island. Our soldiers were already packing it in and leaving the island in smaller and bigger groups when Mustapha Pasha was informed about the landing party of Sicily, however  with a wrong estimate of 16.000 fresh troops. He has hurried up the withdrawal but when he learnt about the exact numbers, he chased his soldiers back on land and engaged with the defenders in open battle. The damage had already been done, the soldiers were tired and their moral destroyed by the happiness of departing a siege they could not win in time and by a forced return to a battle they were not prepared for. Fresh Christian troops pushed the Ottoman army back into the sea and into their boats, quickly departing for Istanbul. They returned at the harbour of Istanbul in the dead of the night, having lost many of their comrades in Malta.

 

 

Article

A new vision

of the Great Siege of Malta 1565

by Charles Mifsud 

It is unavoidably irresistible to explore the days of 'The Great Siege of Malta 1565', a turning point in history, a battle against all odds resisting the supremacy of the Ottoman Empire. Although Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent expected to overrun the island within one week, tiny Malta proved to be a stumbling block rather than the steppingstone to Europe he had imagined. The new Great Siege Events Museum is cultural, historical, educational, highly informative and hugely entertaining presentation.

Charles Mifsud, journalist and renowned photographer, interviews Dane Munro, the creative director of the recently renovated Great Siege Events Museum in Valletta.

Descending into the basement of Café Premier in Valletta, I was transported back 500 years in history, landing right straight into the harem of Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent of the Ottoman Empire. It is here that an important historical epic is unfolding. The daughter of the Sultan, Mirmah, is whispering in the Sultan’s ears, “Please papa, get rid of those knights of St John at Malta, they are raiding our ships”. Roxelana, the Sultan’s Russian born wife, looks on while being manicured by a servant. The saying goes that behind every great man stands an even greater woman, and this too seems to be the case in the Great Siege of Malta in 1565.
 
Dane Munro, the creative director of the recently refurbished Great Siege Events Museum explains that he has delved deeply into the world of the Ottomans and brings on the Ottoman point of view and the reasons behind their attempt to capture Malta and evict the Order.

With the composure of an experienced historian, Dane explained that there is some consensus among historians that not all the Sultan’s reasons to go to war were legitimate and that his personal embitterment against the Order of St John and the influence of the powerful ladies within the Sultan’s harem played a significant role too. Hence, boudoir politics were part of the decision making process.

The presentation at the Great Siege Events Museum is a walk-through event, with life-size artistic mannequins, combined with visual and audio effects. Visitors hear the voice-over through a hand-held audio device and head phones.

When I solicited Dane’s opinion about the view of the Maltese in general as regards the Great Siege, Dane explained that on one occasion a comedian had made fun about the fact that there once there was a siege in Malta and that the Maltese were still moaning about it. He sees it as one of his duties as an historian to increase the awareness of the importance of the Great Siege, not only for the annual one million visitors to Malta, but also for the Maltese themselves. For this reason, he has embarked on a school excursion programme, which is linked with a competition in story writing and drawing. One of the local beliefs is that the Order of St John is entirely to be blamed for the invasion, because the navy of the Order was on a perpetual warpath with all Ottoman and Muslim shipping. Dane however believes that the Ottomans would have come anyway. It wa one of Suleiman's personal wishes that Malta should be taken, since it had those fantastic natural harbours which could serve his navy for logistical purposes. Had Malta remained part of Charles V’s empire, probably no one would have come to the rescue of the island as the defence of Sicily was deemed more important. Without the Knights, the destiny of the Maltese would have probably been sealed and closely connected for many years to that of the mighty Ottoman Empire.

However, Dane also believes that most of the time reproductions of the Great Siege tend to ignore the part played by the Maltese. The Great Siege show delves in the heroic acts of the Maltese. These were crucial in not only surviving the onslaught of the siege but also in winning it. His efforts are directed to give the Maltese population more awareness and ownership of the historical Great Siege, as it was their siege too.

The story of the Great Siege at Café Premier unfolds through the personal account of Francesco Balbi, a soldier and a poet who witnessed the siege in Malta. Dane has transferred Balbi’s historical account into a dramatised version.

Francesco’s emotions flow to the viewer as each chapter of this siege comes alive. Most of the siege’s epic we know from childhood history books, come to the viewer in a new light.

In one instance the Ottomans tried to remove the palisade, a wooden structure built at Senglea’s shore, inhibiting their ships from landing. Maltese skilful swimmers engaged in a hand-to-hand struggle in the sea with the enemy, the latter given a sound beating. One of these heroes was a certain “Pietru Pawlu”, described by Balbi as a brave, bare-footed, barrel-chested farmer, who was running down the shore in his Adam's costume and diving into the water, knife between his teeth.

 

Pietru Pawlu in a heroic water figth against an Ottoman soldier. The Maltese were one of the few people who could actually swim in those days.

The story of the Great Siege as rendered by Dane Munro, while exalting the romantic and heroic acts of the protagonist, always keeps a realistic trait alive to the end.

As we walked through the presentation in the underground vaults, Dane Munro explains the creative work that has been carried out on the mannequins which had been bought (believe it or not) from Turkey. These mannequins were transformed from rigid window shop models to historical icons of the Great Siege of Malta by Maltese artists.

Dane, quite known for his work on the tombstones of the Knights at St John’s Co Cathedral, has a great understanding of the development of a culture of memory. Expanding his knowledge into the realm of the Ottomans has also helped him to create a more vivid artistic interpretation.

Holding a piece of Maltese rope or “qanneb” Dane explains how this would be integrated to one of the scenes in the Great Siege as sea weed.

Dane’s vision is that presentations like the Great Siege will spark the interest of the public at large After all, it changed Malta forever. Down in the vaults, the Great Siege is still a living experience not simply a historical memoir.

English Russian Spanish Swedish Italian Maltese French German Dutch Japanese